Quote:
Mc Veigh never denighed bombing the Federal building.
just like Lee harvey Oswald never did. If the media is owned by corporations who attend the bildebergers anualy ofcource we will get "they never denied".
Actually Oswald
did deny having anything to do with any of it. He said he didn't know why the police wanted him, and that they hadn't said anything about any shooting until they got him to the station. Later he famously claimed to be a 'patsy'.
Quote:
What about thermate leftovers in the area?
Easy, there wasn't any.
There was:
videos
As one of the replys points out. This guy is a physisist, not a metalergist. He also
didn't say he found Thermite, he says that he found slag metal that metalergically contains the byproducts of a thermite reaction. Aluminum, Iron, Sulfate. As another reply to the video points out, what do you think that building was full of? Steel, Iron, Aluminum, and hundreds of tons of Drywall, which is composed of... wait for it... calcium sulfate. That's right.
All the componants of Thermite, or at least an amalgom that melted together would be chemically identical to the residue of Thermite.
Quote:
The Trade Center buildings are the largest things ever created that collapsed. What can you compare it to? 110 storys, 500,000 tons! First off, you've got to know something about the way the buildings were constructed. They were empty boxes, built around 4 small interior steel pillars. The only rigid (steel, concreite) walls in the buildings were the outside walls! They were basically hollow, that's why their design was so innovative. It allowed for massive interior room, while the steel exo-skeleton provided more than enough redundant support to hold everything together, it was also rated to withstand a catagory 4 hurricane. The one thing it was not rated to withstand was nutcases flying 100 ton jet airlines full of fuel through their sides at 500 MPH. Take a cardboard box and sit on it, support your weight, now take a knife and cut out one of those sides, now sit on it, landed on your ass didn't you? It's something of a miracule that they stood as long as they did, but after a couple hours the fire weakened the inside supporting pillars, floor trusses, and walls, then... poof. The whole thing pancaked down on top of itself. When the supports gave out, the top of the building fell, that was 100,000 of so tons, landing on the floor below which had already been weakened, which collasped, adding to the weight, which landed on the floor below, and so on, so it actually picked up speed as it fell.
What a load of bullshit. Carboard is not the same as steel supported building. Fuel [cerosine] CANNOT melt steel!!! Cannot even weaken it. And buildings do not fall at freefall speed no matter what height they are! AND THE WTC TWINS COULD WITHSTAND MULTIPLE PLANE HITS, THATS WHAT THE ARCHITECTS OF THOSE BUILDINGS SAID!!! If you believe D|ck Cheney and the rest of the gang more than the architects themselves then you are mentally ill!
Actually when engineers want to test a design they build a model out of...? Cardboard, or wood. Well they used to now they use something called 'foamcore', but the idea is the same. The physics of engeneering are the same for a doll house as they are for the Twin Towers.
http://www.tcforensic.com.au/docs/article10.html http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.htmlIgnition tempature for kerosine is only about 230 degrees, on the chart you'll see that almost all flammables are in a similar tempiture range. Steel looses it's strutural strenght a 550, and if you take the lower of the two tempature examples, melts at 1100. Ever heard of the phrase, 'Figures lie, and liars figure.'? The way a furnace works is, you stuff it full of fuel, then you force air into it. Structural fires do it all themselves, they're
are the fuel and they're so large they create their own wind, turning themselves into blast furnaces. You've heard of the terms 'Backdraft', and 'Flashover'? That's the same mechanisims at work. My grandfather was a blacksmith. Seriously. Rod Blackhurst, of Buckingham county Virginia. When I was a kid I helped him work his forge. He worked Iron and Steel, using nothing but Coal and a Bellows. If you weren't careful you could 'burn' the metal, that means over heating it and ruining structure, turning it uselessly brittle. How did we heat steel and iron (which has a higher melting point) using only Coal (which burns at 400-500 degrees) and a hand-cranked bellows? It's not possible, coal doesn't burn hot enought make steel soft, let alone melt it. That's the miricule of a furnace, that's why we have and can work metals like titanium that can withstand a couple thousand degrees.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/They were two PBS (public broadcasting system) specials called 'Why the Towers Fell'. PBS is as far left of center as media gets in the US, they went into all this, including interviewing the engineer of the towers who was crying because they didn't stand even longer than they did. He belived he understood the reasons behind the collapse. He built the damn things. He explained how an aircraft knocking out one of the walls would fataly destabalize the structure. First the load would be carried by the surviving walls, but given time and tempurture these would start to slowly fail until it reached a catostrophic point.
Freefall is the velocity a falling body obtains, around 200kmh. In a vacuum all objects fall at the same rate. In the atmosphere things like wind resistance tend to slow falling things down. If you drop a 100,000 tons,
nothing is going to slow it down, even a structure beneath it, it will fall straight through it.
Quote:
H.L.Oswald did this:
Jim Marrs on jfk. He takes a rifle in his hands and trys to shoot:
Just this year they did a reconstruction in Texas, in Deily Plaza, which the same gun, making the actual shot, from the window, as well as the grassy knoll, and the 'sewer' shot. The only one that created the same wounds was the shots from the Schoolbook Depository. They also forensically examined the dictitape recording made when one officer left his mike open, by recreating the shot. The recording seems indicate a third, or maybe even forth shot, but it was discovered to be an echo.
Quote:
Because the Saudis are our buddies. Hell, compared to their neighbors they're practically 'enlightened', and cosmapolitan. It's the dirty little secret of this whole mess that it can all be laid at the feet of Saudi citizens, from Bin Lauden to the highjackers. The problem is this fanatical fundamentalist brand of Islam that's become all comsuming in the last 30 years. In order to be a 'good' muslim, you have to support militant muslims, because, well... they are more 'devout' than you aren't they? Working towards making the muslim world that Mohammud imagined and all. So they throw money at them, to get them to go away, and build schools to teach radical islam, buy guns to shoot Isrealies, or whatever... as long as it's not in Saudi Arabia. Then they go back to collecting sports cars, or raising horses, feeling all pious. This was the first time it ever came back bite them in the ass, embarrassing them and us. So everybody sits around the table ignoring the 500 lb. gorilla in the room (Saudi complicity in the founding and funding of Al Qaeda).
Saudis are your buddies? LOL Maybe Nazi Germany would also be your buddies?! Oh focking right - Prescot Bush funded NAZIS!!!
WHY DID USA INVADE IRAQ IF HIJACKERS WERE FROM SAUDI ARABIA??? ANSWER THE FOCKING QUESTION!
I told you why already as simply as I could, the Saudis are our 'friends'. I had a best friend, Joe Adams. He slept with my girlfriend... Hi, Joe if you are reading this. Can you trust your 'friends'? Not nessessarily. Remember the 'first' Gulf War, Daddy Bush's war? Who was the one country in the region that would allow the US to use thier territory as a base of operations to launch attacks against a 'brother' muslim country? That's right, Saudi Arabia. Hell, Turkey, a Nato member wouldn't let them use Turkish soil. They wouldn't even let us fly over their airspace! The Saudis choose sides back then, they chose to support the 'west' rather than stonewalling like the rest of the Persian Gulf nations. That was a
huge deal back then and the US still hasn't forgotten it. They are still our strongest 'ally' in the region. Heck, we sent one of their princes up in the Space Shuttle, the first muslim in space. The govenment keeps sweeping unpleasant realities under the rug, because without the Saudis (who still nominally support US efforts) the US has
no other friends in the area. Back before the seventies they were all friends of the US, Iran, Iraq, Lebennon. That's one of the reasons the Bush administration is so keen to get a friendly 'democratic' government in Iraq, one more base in the mideast to throw our weight around and help stabilize the region and keep that oil flowing.
Pictures of obviously cut steel beams:
See the guys standing around in those pictures of yours? You know what they're called, Steel Workers. Why are they called Steel Workers? Because they work with steel!!
This is 'groundzero' after the collapse:
http://www.worldproutassembly.org/ground%20zero.jpg
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/groundz ... p_0898.jpg
After the collapse there was a three story high burning pile of rubble and debris, with teetering walls and i-beams. Those guys in the pictures you posted are standing at
ground level. Do you think the workers just dig the rubble out from around those teetering walls and i-beams? No, they bring in cranes and cutting torches. They hook the cranes to the walls and beams, cut them off as low as they can reach, lift out that section, then cut it into smaller pieces to cart away. Then they dig the rubble out until they've exposed enough to have to bring in the cranes and the cutting torches again. Then they keep doing the same thing over and over until they reach the ground, just like the guys in your pictures have done.
Of course those beams have been cut, they were cut by the men tearing it down! With cutting tourches! That much should be obvious...
I'm not new in this town. I've been a conspircacy/occult buff for 20 years, back when there was no internet and all you had was good old books, 'Chariots of the Gods','Late Great Planet Earth', anyone? I've heard them all, my favorite's the 'Philadelphia Experiment' (being from Philadelphia and all), the Nazi 'Bell' is another great mysterious one. Masteromen said something interesting (which has been deleted now...), something to the effect of 'The more I learn about these things, the more I should believe them.', but that's a fallicey. Actually it's usually been the exact opposite, the more I look into these things the less substance I tend find behind them. Nobody can convince me of anything, I have to first look at it and convince myself. It doesn't make it any less interseting, just less 'majical'