Diffeneces between Doom 3 and ROE's engines?

Post by **Trey** » Sun May 23, 2010 9:40 pm

There's definatly something different about ROE's engine, the most obvious is that textures tend to be jagged even with the antialiasing all the way up, which impacts performance. I didn't have to fiddle with Doom 3's AA at all. Anyone know what was changed?

Post by **Meddle** » Mon May 24, 2010 12:34 am

Sounds like AA isn't being applied correctly by the game. You should try using your video cards' control panel to force it on.

Post by **Trey** » Mon May 24, 2010 3:57 am

There's definatly a difference when it's turned up, but after playing it again I remembered it did the same thing on my old computer. At the time I just figured it was my graphics weak computer.

EDIT: Never mind, problem with the config file. FIXED

otiscrusher · Post by **otiscrusher** » Mon May 24, 2010 11:13 am

Just remember if you've turned on VSYNC then your monitor frequency must be 60 to avoid choppy framerate.

Kessler · Post by **Kessler** » Sun May 30, 2010 11:18 am

The only difference I am aware of is the portal sky function in RoE (a skybox that is practically a camera view of another room, with models and stuff in it to create a panorama). Portal sky also works in regular Doom3 with the help of a mod.

But it is the same engine, RoE just has new media added and some extra functionality unlocked.

Post by **Trey** » Sun May 30, 2010 8:39 pm

I had my config file edited improperly...

otiscrusher · Post by **otiscrusher** » Mon May 31, 2010 11:50 am

It's one exciting topic I'd say.

And, yeah, there's no difference whatsoever. Until you're on drugs, of course.