Should the 4Share upload standard file size be raised?

Think you have a suggestion to make? Feel free to post it here!

Moderator: LW Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Trey
Super Member
Posts: 1671
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 3:43 am
Location: U.S.A. - Just like Disneyland! (but with more Porn, Drugs, and Guns)
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Should the 4Share upload standard file size be raised?

Post by Trey »

I know that 40-50MB was the standard upload file size for 4Share. Wasn't that because the old size Max on there was 50MB? Since the Max has been raised to 100MB shouldn't we ask for the standard to be closer to 100MB? It would halve the number of files you need to download in most cases.

I do understand that many of these uploads are archives of the original uploads and it would be impractical to re-rar them with larger breaks, but for new files being uploaded I think it might help.
User avatar
otiscrusher
Super Member
Posts: 1680
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:18 pm
Location: Russia

Post by otiscrusher »

the smaller the size - the better for me. Less hassle that way.
User avatar
zobraks
Super Member
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: Eurosongland 2008
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Should the 4Share upload standard file size be raised?

Post by zobraks »

Trey wrote:Since the Max has been raised to 100MB shouldn't we ask for the standard to be closer to 100MB? It would halve the number of files you need to download in most cases.
Yes, it would halve the number of files, but I still remember those hard days I was on the freaking dial-up when downloading a 50 megs monsters was an adventure in itself :(.

So, as far as I am concerned (and I, alas, don't upload much), the max size will stay around 50 MBs. Some wretched bastard with dial-up will get his small chance. :)
Cyanide
Advanced Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:36 am

Post by Cyanide »

It takes me about 1 hour to download 50 mbs with my 128kbit connection. Even though disconnections are very rare, wasting 2 hours instead of 1 for a file that can't be resumed would be worse :(
User avatar
Egon68
Super Member
Posts: 3759
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:28 pm
Location: Tuppukylä
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 130 times
Contact:

Post by Egon68 »

And if a file gets corrupt, it's much easier to upload 50 megs than 100 megs.
I decided a while ago to use 50 megs per file if the game has 2 cds or less
and 100 megs if it has 3 discs or more. For DVDs I usually use 100 megs
per file, but if the game is relatively small, then it's 50 megs.
Nunc est bibendum!
User avatar
otiscrusher
Super Member
Posts: 1680
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:18 pm
Location: Russia

Post by otiscrusher »

That's right. I don't want to waste 2 hours upping 1 piece, it's so stupid and a inpracticle.
User avatar
hurenBock
Super Member
Posts: 1827
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: Germany Rheinland Pfalz

Post by hurenBock »

but if someone`s lazy

100 MB parts r better than 50 MB parts

500 MB = 5 x 100 = 5 clicks = 500 MB lol

500 MB = 10 x 50 = 10 clicks = 500 MB but much more clicks

and upping 10, 100 MB files isnt as much work as upping 20, 50 MB files
but well .....ah......whatever........

just wanted to say that im pissed off sometimes cause i have to download 50 mb parts instead of 100 ones......

oh and dont get me wrong now dudes
i love your uploads and btw between the lines....plz keep it up...... but like i said sometimes it just pisses me off
Idiots are just like the weather. You have to live with it.
User avatar
zobraks
Super Member
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: Eurosongland 2008
Been thanked: 55 times

Post by zobraks »

I guess you can't look a gift horse in the mouth. :P
Last edited by zobraks on Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hurenBock
Super Member
Posts: 1827
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: Germany Rheinland Pfalz

Post by hurenBock »

didnt got this one..... really i dont
Idiots are just like the weather. You have to live with it.
User avatar
zobraks
Super Member
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: Eurosongland 2008
Been thanked: 55 times

Post by zobraks »

What I meant is: uploaders choose the size of the split archive parts and we can choose to download those or not. That's all.

If someone gives you something, you can't be choosy about it.
User avatar
hfric
3DSL Moderator
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:51 am
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 233 times

Post by hfric »

next time when i will up dvd9 game i will be ultra sado masochistic and set it to 1 mb parts
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Image
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
User avatar
zobraks
Super Member
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:13 pm
Location: Eurosongland 2008
Been thanked: 55 times

Post by zobraks »

:o
No, please! I hardly survived downloading those 121 fifty megabytes parts of Tender Loving Care. :D
SpineSplitter
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm

Post by SpineSplitter »

hfric wrote:next time when i will up dvd9 game i will be ultra sado masochistic and set it to 1 mb parts
How many clicks would that be 8,540 :lol:
User avatar
freakboy
Super Member
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:03 am

Post by freakboy »

Well, since 4shared is stable for me then I would say 100Mb is ok'ish. 80Mb is also fine. 50Mb for big games is not a very good idea.
User avatar
otiscrusher
Super Member
Posts: 1680
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:18 pm
Location: Russia

Post by otiscrusher »

1 KB per part is the best deal for me.
Post Reply